An Abuja High Court on Thursday struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the lawmaker representing Kogi Central, bringing an end to a high-profile legal battle that drew nationwide attention.
Dip Connect Online News reports that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Discontinuance, prompting the court to formally dismiss the criminal defamation and related charges previously brought against the senator.
The case arose from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview and had sparked significant debate on freedom of expression, political accountability, and the limits of prosecutorial powers in a democracy.
The Notice of Discontinuance, dated December 12, 2025, concluded proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
Presiding over the matter, Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged the notice and struck out the case, emphasizing the importance of restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” the judge said.
FG’s counsel confirmed the withdrawal in court, stating, “On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, we have filed a notice of discontinuance in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act. This decision is taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.”
Reacting to the ruling, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the outcome as a vindication of her position.
“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, expressing gratitude to her legal team and supporters for their steadfast support throughout the proceedings.
The dismissal concludes months of legal controversy and follows sustained criticism from civil society organisations and rights groups, which had condemned the case as an attempt to suppress free speech and political engagement.
Elijah Adeyemi
